Case Studies in Accounting and Financial Management Academic Essay

MGT 329 COURSEWORKS, 2015-2016 Coursework I The coursework is done by individuals. It is worth 20% of the overall marks for the module. Submissions will be 1/3/16 (for first two elements below) and 7/3/16 (for the third element). Part (i) will be submitted online by 11am. In addition hard copies of parts (i) and (ii) will be brought to the session at 12pm. The third element will be submitted online by 3pm. (i) Each student will prepare an answer to the coursework question (maximum 1000 words). (ii) Each student will self-assess their own work (maximum 250 words). This is to help as a learning exercise. There will be penalties for any student that fails to conduct this self-assessment. 5% (absolute) will be deducted from the overall mark obtained for Coursework 1. (iii) Each student will assess the work of one of their colleagues (maximum 500 words). This assessment will be the basis for some assessment by the module leader. The initial sub-assessment is intended as a learning exercise for both assessor and assessed. There will be penalties for not this assessment (as per iii). This assessment, worth 20% of the overall marks of the module, will be decided by the module leader. Part (a) Compare and contrast the papers of Mundy (2010) and Wouters and Widerom (2008), both published in Accounting, Organizations and Society (pp. 499-523 and pp. 488-516 of their respective years). Take care to include reflection on their understanding of enabling accounting/control. (Maximum 500 words) Part (b) How do the papers in part (a), taken together, compare and contrast with Adler and Borys (1996) (published in Administrative Science Quarterly) and Broadbent et al. (1997), published in Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (pp. 61-89 and pp. 265-75 of their respective years) (Maximum 500 words) (Precis any overlap with part (a)). Coursework II This is group coursework. Groups will be decided at the start of week 3. This coursework component will be worth 25% of the overall marks for the module. Submission date: 15/4/16 (online by 3pm). Maximum word length: 4000 words. Each group will prepare an answer of a maximum of 4000 words including references to the coursework question shown below. Groups will prepare presentation slides and present. One fifth of the 25% marks are allocated to the presentation. The assessment is worth 25% of the overall marks for the module. Part (a) In a maximum of 2000 words, explain how Tucker (2013) seeks to advance research into accounting colonization? Part (b) In a maximum of 2000 words, critically assess the arguments in Tucker (2013). Coursework III This coursework is to be prepared by individuals. It is worth 55% of the overall mark for the module. Submission date 10/5/16 (online by 11am) Maximum word length: 3000 words. Considering all the readings focused upon in the module, how can their theoretical approaches be reconciled in the analysis of accounting in a micro-organizational context? READINGS Adler, P. and B. Borys (1996), Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), pp. 61-89. Broadbent, J., Ciancanelli, P., Gallhofer, S. and J. Haslam (1997), Enabling Accounting: the way forward?, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10(3), pp. 265-75. Broadbent, J. and R. Laughlin (2005), Organisational and accounting change: theoretical and empirical reflections and thoughts on a future research agenda, Journal of Accounting and Organisational Change, 1(1), pp. 7-26. Dent, J. (1991), Accounting and Organizational Cultures: a Field Study of the Emergence of a New Organizational Reality, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16 (8), pp. 705-32. Gallhofer, S. and J. Haslam (1991), The aura of accounting in the context of a crisis: Germany and the First World War, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16(4-5), pp. 487-520. Gallhofer, S., Haslam, J. and A. Yonekura (2015), Accounting as differentiated universal for emancipatory praxis: accounting delineation and mobilization for emancipation(s) recognising democracy and difference, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(5), pp. 846-74. Humphrey, C. and R. Scapens (1996), Methodological themes: theories and case studies of organizational accounting practices: limitation or liberation, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9(4), pp. 86-106. Hopwood, A. (1983), On trying to study accounting in the contexts in which it operates, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 8(2), pp. 287-305. Laughlin, R. (1991), Environmental disturbances and organizational transitions and transformations: some alternative models, Organization Studies, 12(2), pp. 209-232. Laughlin, R. (1995), Empirical Research in Accounting: the case for middle-range thinking, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(1), pp. 63-87. Malmi, T. (1999), Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(8), pp. 649-672. Masquefa, B. (2008), Top management adoption of a locally driven performance evaluation system: a social network perspective, Management Accounting Research, 19, 182-207. Mundy, J. (2010), Creating dynamic tensions through a balanced use of management control systems, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(5), pp. 499-523. Oakes, H. and A. Berry (2009), Accounting Colonization: three case studies in further education, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(3), pp. 343-78. Scapens, R. (1990), Researching Management Accounting Practice: the role of case study methods, British Accounting Review, 22(3), pp. 259-281. Tucker, B. (2013), Environmental disturbances, organizational transitions and transformations: a View from the Dark Side, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24, 242-59. Wouters, M. and C. Wilderom (2008), Developing performance-measurement systems as enabling formalization: a longitudinal field study of a logistics department, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), pp. 488-516. Broken down by general or applicable course work: General Burchell et al. (1980) Hopwood (1983) Humphrey and Scapens (1996) Laughlin (1995) Scapens (1990) Coursework 1 Adler and Borys (1996) Broadbent et al. (1997) Wouters and Wilderom (2008) Mundy (2010) Coursework 2 Broadbent and Laughlin (2005) Dent (1991) Laughlin (1991) Malmi (1999) Masquefa (2008) Tucker (2013) Coursework 3 ALL of the above, PLUS: Gallhofer and Haslam (1991) Oakes and Berry (2009) Gallhofer et al. (2015) PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

Still stressed from student homework?
Get quality assistance from academic writers!