Credibility Smith and Kraus Custom Essay

[pewslideshow slidename=anim2]

Assignment Question: Comparing the Credibility of two Sources

Background: In the news item headlined Tanning bed danger disputed; study finds risk of cancer is high (see link below), Patrick Smith and John Kraus disagree about whether recent studies by IARC (The International Agency for Research on Cancer) demonstrate that the use of tanning beds can cause cancer. IARC is part of the World Health Organiztion, or WHO.

Question: Compare the credibility of Smith and Kraus as sources of the claim that recent studies by IARC show that the use of tanning beds can cause cancer. In your answer: begin by stating clearly the claim at issue and who the sources are; address each aspect of credibility (opportunity, ability and dependability), explicitly stating your conclusion about which source fares better on each of the three aspects of credibility; and end your assessment with an overall judgment about which source is the more credible source of the claim at issue.

Tips: Although each of the sources make several claims in the news report, your task is to focus your answer exclusively on the claim identified in italics in this question. Read the Self-Evaluation checklist on the last page of this assignment for further guidelines, and for advice about how to organize your answer.

Maximum length is 500 words.

Self?Evaluation Checklist
Use this checklist as a guide to any revisions that may be necessary to your answer.

You’ve identified accurately and expressed clearly the claim about which Smith and Kraus disagree. (Since the claim was given to you in the assignment, that should be easy. Just write, The claim Smith and Kraus disagree about is whether recent studies by IARC show that the use of tanning beds can cause cancer. There is no need to reword this.)

You’ve discussed the three aspects/dimensions of credibility of Smith and Kraus:
a. opportunity to discover the truth of the claim (not the ability to state the claim)
b. ability to make a judgement about the claim
c. dependability of the source

Furthermore, your comparison of all three dimensions of credibility (opportunity, ability, dependability) is explicit. This requires using the terms opportunity, ability, and dependability. The best way to organize your answer in a way that provides an explicit comparison of each aspect of credibility is to compare the opportunity of Smith and Kraus in one paragraph; the ability of Smith and Kraus in another paragraph; and the dependability of the Smith and Krauss in a third paragraph. At the beginning of each of those paragraphs, state your conclusion about the aspect or dimension of credibility you are discussing in that paragraph.

Opportunity, abililty, and dependability are not confused with one another. (E.g. when you claim to be discussing opportunity, you do not instead discuss the source’s credentials, which are more likely to be an aspect of the source’s ability.).

Your judgements about each of the three dimensions of credibility are backed up with relevant and sufficient reasoning.

Your conclusion about which source is more credible is clearly stated: e.g. X is the more credible source.

Your conclusion about who is the more credible source of the claim is consistent with your conclusions about which source has more opportunity, ability, and dependability.

You do NOT discuss whether you agreed or disagreed with the claim, or whether the claim is true. (That wouldnt be relevant here.)

You do NOT discuss whether or not the evidence for the claim is good.

Place an order of a custom essay for this assignment with us now. You are guaranteed; a custom premium paper being delivered within its deadline, personalized customer support and communication with your writer through out the order preparation period.

[pewslideshow slidename=anim3]

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more