effect of light on acheta domesticus Academic Essay

studied. The results of the study need to be compared with other research in the literature, because this places the reported findings inthe context of the larger scientific discipline and highlights the significance of the reported research. This is where you report whetheryour findings are new or unexpected, and whether they are in agreement with or at odds with similar studies. The integration ofinformation learned from your study with ideas from other research is essential for presenting credible arguments. Your explanationsmust be clear and you must present logical progressions of ideas to support your claims. Ideas presented from the literature to supportyour claims must be cited. Abstract (150 200 words, see page 14 for further details) This is a short summary (one paragraph) of theexperiment that briefly summarises each section of the paper. You must write no more than 12sentences on each of the following: oWhy you did your study (the objective/rationale/research question) o What you did (methods) o What you found (results: no numericalvalues required, describe in words) o The implications of your findings Discussion (Max 1000 words, see page 15 for further details) Briefly restate the objective of your study (1 sentence only). Briefly summarise the results of your experiment (23sentences only),without repeating the numerical values. Describe in words the overall effect of the factor on the behaviour of your animal, distinguishingbetween trial 1 and 2 if necessary. Refer to your original prediction and explain how or why your factor was expected to have this effecton your animals behavioural response, using evidence from the literature. o State whether your results were consistent with yourprediction or not, distinguishing between Trial 1 & 2 if necessary (1 sentence only). Compare your results with two peerreviewedstudies that have investigated the effect of the same factor on your research animal or a closely related species. o State whether thestudies support your findings, or if the results are different, propose an explanation for why the differences exist. You need to describethe studies with sufficient detail so that readers can evaluate the validity of your comparisons, and the evidence must be well integrated(see page 25 for further details). o If you compare your experiment with a peerreviewedstudy that investigated a different type ofresponse or a different species explain how their findings relate to your experiment. o Regardless of whether the two peerreviewedstudies support or contradict your findings, you need to relate the literature to your findings and indicate what this means in terms of theresponse of your research animal to the factor. Describe a source of variation that you think likely influenced your results. Useevidence (from your own observations and/or the literature) to explain why you think this is the case. Describe a plausible biologicalimplication of your findings. For example, if your research animals were to show the same behavioural response to variation of theabiotic factor in their natural environment, how could this potentially influence their survival, growth or reproduction? o Logicallyconnect the behavioural response to the biology of the animals, and use evidence from the literature to develop an ecological,physiological or biochemical reason for the observed response. Describe one constraint (other than small sample size) of your studythat limits your ability to extrapolate your results to the entire population. Explain how it limits extrapolation. Suggest a realistic andsensible way to remove this constraint in a future study. Conclusion. Include a final two to three sentences summarising the overallfinding of the study?? this comes at the end of the discussion (not a separate section). This assignment must be: completed individually?? PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

Still stressed from student homework?
Get quality assistance from academic writers!