Qualitative Systematic Review Proposal Academic Essay

The assignment instructions: Please do (Qualitative Systematic Review Proposal): Details of task: ?Students will formulate a systematic review research question, devise a plan to answer it, and develop a protocol for the review and meta-synthesis. A systematic review protocol is a complete outline of the process of undertaking the review and plan for the analysis of the review data. Your proposal should include the following: ? ? Proposal title: Make this short, descriptive and no more than 10-12 words; the title should explain succinctly what the project is about. Basically be A systematic review on the effectiveness of simulation in health professional education for mass casualty incidences. ? Abstract: This must be no longer than 250 words; word count will be strictly enforced. It should include a statement of the problem, the aims and methods, and the significance of your proposed study. Is basically a summary of the problem, the aims and methods, and the significance of your proposed study (why is it important)? Come up with from the literature why researching simulation in education for mass casualty incidences is so important. Could it be that it will save lives? Leave abstract til last and then summarise what you have written? ? Review question, objectives, PICO (500 words): clearly identify the research problem to be investigated and state the review question and list the objectives of the review. Identify the PICO/PICo. I will download my background + PICO, which I wrote in the previous assignment, but you need to paraphrase them to avoid plagiarism. Explain the significance of your study. What is the effectiveness of simulation in health professional education for mass casualty incidents. Objectives to find out the effectiveness of simulation utilising primary research articles. Give other objectives. The significance practicing saves lives and in particular with a mass casualty incident we know that many lives could be lost. ? Background (~1,500 words): Describe the background to your study (i.e. the rationale or impetus for the study) and how the results might be used. Describe the clinical condition, population, interventions, comparisons, phenomenon and outcomes (as appropriate) with appropriate references. Provide a critical justification for your review. Talk about mass casualty incidences and whether simulation has in the past been effective. Or, there is little research known if this is effective? So it is effective students need to practice to be proficient. Write about this and use journal articles to support what you are saying. ? Review design: Discuss the qualitative data of systematic review being undertaken and justify why this particular approach is being undertaken Justify why only use qualitative articles? ? Eligibility or Inclusion criteria: Detail the planned inclusion criteria including population or participants, interventions or the phenomenon, comparators, outcomes, timing, setting or context and language as appropriate to your systematic review design. These should be supported by references used to define and justify why these elements, where appropriate. In addition, the types of studies for inclusion should be explained. Specific exclusion criteria should be described and justified why. For example inclusion, might be articles published within 2006-2016. Because 10 years is about the time for current research? Find out a reference that says why 10 years is the best. Population or participants is it students only or nurses only or doctors and nurses, for example. Setting is it university only is it hospitals etc.? Language English only. ? Search Strategy: The search strategy should be detailed including the steps, data bases and search terms. The search strategy should represent a plan for a robust and exhaustive search of all the available evidence regarding your question. A draft of the specific terms to be used for two data bases (Ovid Medline and CINAHL), including planned limits such that it could be repeated, should be included. ? Evidence Appraisal: the methods and process related to the selection and appraisal should be described. The plan for documentation of this process should be explained. Planned tools used should be critiqued, appended and referenced. Tool talk about JBI http://joannabriggs.org/sumari.html How effective the tool is, ? etc. Why use a meta-synthesis? Qualitative data is useful for providing a snapshot at one persons interpretation of an event or phenomenon. By bringing together many different interpretations you are strengthening the evidence for an interpretation by discovering common themes and differences & building new interpretations of the topic of interest. In Summary; A meta-synthesis can be a useful tool to extend knowledge and you should now know how to do one. ? Analysis: Describe, using methodology-specific references, how you intend to extract and analyse the data collected. Additionally, if you propose to use software, clearly identify which software will be used and why. I want you use JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute, 2015). I will download it for you. ? Rigour: Describe and justify the processes you will utilise to improve rigour and reduce bias in your review. Provide references to support your processes and justification. Talk about how rigorous your findings will be? I will download the table of rigour? and below example: To ensure rigour within the review, the data were thematically analysed beginning with a basic reporting of results (Rodgers et al. 2007; p. 9) developing a preliminary synthesis; exploring relationships in the data; explanation on why and how these interventions are with effect; developing a theoretical model of how the interventions work, why and for whom and assessing the robustness of the synthesis product (Popay et al. 2006; p. 12) By utilizing this framework, a concise and rigorous narrative synthesis in this systematic literature review occurred. ? Ethical considerations: Discuss how you will apply ethical principles in your review. ? Dissemination of findings: Outline how you propose to share your findings with others. Write about how and who you will present the findings too? Presentation at your university write this up as a journal article etc? * Provide a reference list using APA 6th edition format, for all literature cited in the assignment. Useful information for this assignment: Reason for Reviews (why it is important): This is the key reason why a systematic review is important for researchers and is considered the gold standard of literature review the best one. Such a review enables the reduction of large quantities of information to more manageable levels, allows integration of critical pieces of information, is an e cient technique, can establish generalizablilty, assesses consistency of relationships, may explain data inconsistencies or con icts, and may increase power by pooling results (Bowman 2007; Mulrow 1994). Articles to include in the review: Look for only qualitative articles published between 2006-2016, that only include (for example students only), that only refer to simulation in mass incidences, with a university nursing setting (for example), must be published in a peer reviewed journal and MUST HAVE HAD ETHICAL APPROVAL EXPLICITLY STATED IN THE ARTICLE. Articles to support your proposal Does NOT matter whether they are qualitative, quantitative or a review? PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT

Place your order
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more